Users who want to avoid the small ps overhead can # this doesn't work (no X11.app running), we give up and dumbly set the # we deduce and construct the DISPLAY value from the process. # Now set the DISPLAY variable, if needed. I wrote a script (zsh syntax) to find the correct DISPLAY variable for each of the simultaneous sessions, as usual, with much help from Gary and others here. However, you might have a startup script that over-rides this. X11.app automatically sets the correct DISPLAY for multiple simultaneous users, so xterm for example can launch other xapps. Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together. (I love a good crash) Thus, the DISPLAY variable was set correctly in the xterm window. (like mine, unfortunately) However, my poor testuser has no shell environment. Maybe your other user's shell startup script sets the DISPLAY variable to a static value. delay (ms) is subtracted from the local 'clock'.Ex: It takes around 60ms on my mac to launch the audio stream at the Anchor Time. Please see the following link and include in your ASA those additional ports/range.
#Wireshark for mac x11 tv
Out of curiosity, what do you get when you execute: Apple TV requires more than 5353 port opened. Thus, the main user cannot access the socket of the testuser but both can see both sockets. Together with supporting libraries and applications, it forms the X11.app that Apple shipped with OS X versions 10.5 through 10.7. Xlib: connection to ":1.0" refused by server Voici mon problème : Jai un MacBook CoreDuo avec Leopard. Mais je vous assure que jai cherché de partout avant de poster ce message. Srwxrwxrwx 1 kerby wheel 0B Dec 5 04:20 X1= Salut tout le monde Je sais, un n-ème sujet sur X11. Srwxrwxrwx 1 kerbaugh wheel 0B Dec 5 04:20 X0= With both me and my testuser, kerby, (the virtual crash-test dummy) running X11, I get the following outputs in the main user's shell: The display is different for each different Xsession. It's done rather differently in Tiger, if my system is generic in that regard. The socket would act like a number of sockets, one for each per-session bootstrap namespace. Technical Note TN2083: Daemons and Agents) It would be possible to use the socket independently in different per-session namespaces. It would seem more likely that your sockets behave in a rather unPOSIX manner with respect to Mach namespaces. Can your users write to each other's X11 display with sudo? That would seem rather unlikely to be considered a satisfactory implementation. That's incredible! Are you sure? Maybe Apple did it differently in Panther but it's hard to imagine that writes to a socket can be "pipelined" to correct "screen" according to username.
both xterms have DISPLAY set to 😮.0, yet the X11
0 kommentar(er)
